Rebranding Kotak Cherry

From Legacy Investment App to Trust-First Growth Platform

  1. Business Context

Retail investing in India was experiencing rapid growth, with digital-first competitors like Groww and Paytm Money gaining market share through simplified, modern experiences.

Kotak had strong brand credibility but:

  • The legacy investment app felt visually outdated

  • Key journeys (especially SIP onboarding) had high drop-off

  • The experience did not reflect a digital-first positioning

  • Recurring investment adoption was underperforming

Legacy app screenshots

1.1 Business Objectives

  • Reposition Kotak Cherry as a modern, trustworthy investment platform

  • Increase SIP (Systematic Investment Plan) adoption

  • Reduce onboarding and mandate-stage drop-offs

  • Improve first-time investor confidence

  • Drive recurring AUM growth

This rebrand was not cosmetic—it was a strategic growth initiative.

  1. My Role

I led

  • UX strategy for high-impact investment journeys (SIP, onboarding)

  • Behavioral research for recurring investments

  • Competitive benchmarking

  • Affinity synthesis and journey mapping

  • Interaction and visual redesign

  • Cross-functional alignment with product, growth, compliance, and engineering

  • Usability validation and iteration

  1. Rebranding Strategy

The rebrand focused on three strategic pillars.

3.1 Trust as a Visual Language

  • Clean gradient systems balancing modernity with financial credibility

  • Structured data presentation

  • Strong visual hierarchy

  • WCAG-compliant contrast ratios

  • Calm, purposeful micro-interactions

The goal was premium without intimidation.

3.2 Simplified Decision Architecture

We reduced cognitive overload by:

  • Introducing card-based fund discovery

  • Standardizing typography and spacing

  • Improving performance metric hierarchy

  • Creating modular, scalable design components

This improved clarity and reduced decision fatigue.

3.3 Behavioral Confidence in Investing

Research revealed that recurring investment anxiety—not complexity—was the primary barrier.

SIP became the core growth lever within the rebrand.

  1. Research & Discovery

4.1 Methods

  • Secondary research (RBI mandate rules, SIP trends)

  • Competitive analysis (Groww, INDmoney, Kuvera, Paytm Money)

  • 8 moderated interviews (age 24–38)

  • Low-fidelity prototype testing

  • Journey mapping & affinity clustering

4.2 Competitive Landscape & Opportunity

As part of discovery, I conducted a structured competitive teardown focused on two critical growth journeys:

  1. Customer Registration (KYC + onboarding)

  2. Mutual Fund purchase + SIP activation

Rather than high-level feature comparison, I analyzed:

  • Which apps automated steps to reduce onboarding friction

  • How seamlessly SIP setup was integrated within fund purchase

  • Mandate creation experience (UPI / Netbanking clarity, redirects, status feedback)

  • Depth and usability of SIP calculators

  • Fund comparison tools and decision support

4.3 Observations

Ecosystem-driven but comparatively complex navigation and mandate steps.

Optimized for speed. Minimal friction during fund discovery and SIP setup. Limited reassurance layers.

Strong data presentation and portfolio visibility. More information-heavy flows.

Advisory-oriented but dense information architecture.

4.4 Strategic Gap Identified

Most competitors optimized for transactional efficiency. Very few optimized for psychological reassurance during recurring commitment.

SIP is not just a transaction—it is a recurring financial promise.

This insight shaped our positioning:

Kotak Cherry would differentiate by balancing simplicity with confidence-building design.

This directly influenced the introduction of autopay education layers, deduction previews, and visible pause/edit controls.

4.5 Key Behavioral Insight

Users think in this order:

  • How much will go?

  • When will it go?

  • Can I stop it?

  • Is this safe?

The system was structured around compliance steps. Users were thinking about control and safety.

This mismatch caused abandonment.

  1. Platform-Level Regulatory & Onboarding Constraints

Before optimizing SIP specifically, we addressed broader regulatory and onboarding requirements that impacted all investment actions across the platform.

Regulatory requirements were non-negotiable:

  • Full KYC verification

  • Risk profiling questionnaire

  • Suitability mapping

  • FATCA declaration

  • Explicit consent architecture

  • Nominee capture (where mandatory)

Product wanted fewer steps. Compliance required completeness. Users wanted simplicity.

Removing steps was impossible. Reducing perceived effort was possible.

We could not remove regulatory steps. The opportunity was to restructure and sequence them to reduce perceived effort across the platform while protecting conversion.

  1. Deep Dive: Optimizing SIP for Growth

6.1 Baseline Metrics

  • 62% completion rate

  • High abandonment at autopay mandate stage

  • Average completion time: ~6.5 minutes

  • Trust rating: 3.1/5

SIPs directly contribute to predictable recurring revenue. Improving this flow had measurable financial implications.

6.2 SIP-Specific Growth Optimization Strategy

6.2.1 Autopay & Mandate Friction Reduction

Drop-off was highest at the autopay mandate stage. Users perceived automated deductions as loss of control.

To address this, we:

  • Introduced a dedicated autopay education layer

  • Made "Pause anytime" and "Modify anytime" explicit

  • Added clear transition states when redirecting to external mandate flows

This reframed SIP from a permanent commitment to a controllable recurring action.

6.2.2 Behavioral Risk Profiling Within Investment Intent

Responses mapped to backend risk categories. Legal and compliance approved revised wording.

We reframed as:

"How would you react if your investment drops 20%?"

Instead of technical jargon:

"Select your volatility tolerance"

6.2.3 Consent & Commitment Clarity During SIP Activation

Rather than scattered consent interruptions during investment confirmation, we:

  • Logically grouped disclosures

  • Used one primary consent with expandable details

  • Highlighted critical risk disclosures visually

Legal copy remained untouched. Layout reduced perceived burden while preserving regulatory integrity.

6.2.4 Intent-Based Sequencing for Conversion

Users could browse funds before triggering KYC completion.

Investment intent was built before regulatory friction appeared. Transaction gates remained fully compliant.

This improved the quality of users entering the SIP funnel and reduced early abandonment.

6.3 Mandate Flow Architecture & Drop-Off Prevention

Autopay setup required external verification through BSE Star and netbanking. This introduced a mandatory delay and a high-risk abandonment moment within the SIP funnel.

6.3.1 Key Challenges

  • Mandatory ~1 minute verification delay (compliance constraint)

  • External redirection for mandate authentication

  • Users dropping off mid-verification

  • Bank selection memory gaps on re-entry

  • Future mandate limit modification friction

Compliance preserved. Cognitive load reduced.

6.3.2 Design Decisions

Autopay Rebuttal

Autopay Rebuttal

Bank selection

Bank selection

Autopay max limit

Autopay max limit

Wait before verification

Wait before verification

6.3.2.1 Exit Rebuttal Layer (Back Navigation Interception)

When users attempted to exit during mandate setup, we introduced an educational rebuttal modal explaining autopay benefits (hassle-free, regular investing, secure). This reduced premature abandonment at a high-intent moment.

6.3.2.2 Conditional Bank Selection Logic

Supported multiple states:

  • First-time mandate setup

  • Additional mandate creation

  • Profile-triggered autopay setup

This ensured scalability without fragmenting the flow.

6.3.2.3 Future-Proofed Autopay Limit Design

Encouraged users to select a higher upper limit to prevent repeated authorization cycles when SIP amounts increased later. This reduced long-term compliance friction.

6.3.2.4 Countdown-Based Activation Screen

The mandatory wait time was reframed as a guided activation moment with a visible countdown, nudging users to complete verification immediately rather than postponing.

6.3.2.5 Multi-Session Recovery Handling

If users dropped off and returned later, we surfaced a bank-selection dropdown to resolve ambiguity about previously selected accounts. This handled state persistence and reduced rework.

6.4 SIP Usability Validation

Metric

Before

After

Completion Rate

62%

88%

Avg Completion Time

6.5 min

4 min

Trust Rating

3.1/5

4.3/5

6.5 SIP Business Impact

  • Increased SIP activation rate

  • Reduced mandate-stage drop-offs

  • Higher first-time investor conversion

  • Increased recurring AUM inflow

SIPs generate predictable recurring revenue. Improving completion created compounding growth impact.

  1. Broader Product Optimization: Dashboard Clarity

While SIP optimization drove recurring revenue, the dashboard remained the highest-traffic screen and the first trust touchpoint after login.

7.1 Usability Findings

Testing revealed:

  • Users wanted immediate visibility of asset-class performance alongside overall returns

  • Top-tab navigation fragmented portfolio understanding

  • The hero card interaction (dropdown arrow) was unclear

  • Transaction status was not easily visible without deeper navigation

SIPs generate predictable recurring revenue. Improving completion created compounding growth impact.

7.2 Strategic Decision

Instead of incremental UI tweaks, we restructured the dashboard hierarchy:

  • Removed top-tab navigation and replaced it with contextual portfolio cards

  • Brought asset-class returns directly below overall portfolio value

  • Simplified hero card data hierarchy for faster scanning

  • Clarified transaction status messaging above the fold

  • Reduced ambiguous affordances

7.3 Outcome

The redesign improved first-impression clarity and reduced navigation friction, reinforcing the platform's trust-first positioning. The dashboard shifted from being informational to being confidence-building.

  1. Stakeholder Leadership & Buy-In

To avoid aesthetic-only debates, I anchored discussions in:

  • Drop-off analytics

  • Behavioral research findings

  • Prototype walkthroughs

  • Compliance-preserving design proposals

When legal resisted consent restructuring, I demonstrated consent fatigue data and preserved exact legal copy while improving hierarchy.

When growth requested removing nominee capture, I negotiated "Remind me later" where legally permissible.

Alignment achieved across:

  • Product

  • Growth

  • Compliance

  • Engineering

  1. Key Takeaway

In fintech, speed does not drive adoption, perceived control does.

By reframing onboarding from form completion to confidence building, we improved user trust, increased recurring investments, and contributed directly to revenue growth.

Designing high-trust products that balance compliance, clarity and conversion.

Schedule a call with Abhijeet

Designing high-trust products that balance compliance, clarity and conversion.

Schedule a call with Abhijeet

Designing high-trust products that balance compliance, clarity and conversion.

Schedule a call with Abhijeet

Designing high-trust products that balance compliance, clarity and conversion.

Schedule a call with Abhijeet